Correction: Maximizing Compounded Charge Per Unit Of Measurement Of Return

A few readers pointed out a typo in addition to an arithmetics mistake inwards my article "Maximizing Compounded Rate of Return". In the geometric random walk illustration where the stock tin plough over notice become upward or downwardly 1% at every step, the hateful charge per unit of measurement of provide m is 0%, (not 1%), in addition to the compounded charge per unit of measurement of provide is -0.005% (not -0.5%). My sincere thank yous to all my readers who mercilessly scrutinize my ideas in addition to banking concern fit my numbers!